What Is the Best AI Girlfriend App? 8 Apps Tested and Ranked (April 2026)

Why Are Most AI Girlfriend Apps Either Boring or Cheap-Feeling?

Most ai girlfriend apps fail in one of two ways. They're either text-only and feel scripted, or they're image-forward and feel cheap. After testing across the category, I've stopped treating that split as a coincidence and started treating it as a design philosophy. Apps either chase relationship simulation and skimp on the visual layer, or chase the visual layer and skimp on the relationship. Almost nobody ships both well on the same character.

The text-only camp — Character.AI, Replika in default mode, Anima — caps at “create a character, type messages back and forth.” Conversations are intuitive but flat. The persona drifts after a couple dozen messages because the context window can't hold the thread. The image-forward camp — Candy AI, DreamGF, HeraHaven — leans hard on selfies and stylized renders, but the chat itself runs shallow, the memory resets, and the whole thing starts to feel transactional. NSFW without storyline ends up being, as more than a few testers in our circle have said out loud, “porn with extra steps.”

The shortlist of apps that escape both failure modes is small. AI companion apps hit 220 million cumulative downloads by July 2025, an 88% year-over-year jump per Appfigures. The demand is real. The supply is loud. And most of that supply is one of those two failure modes wearing a different skin. If you've already tried something and bounced, you weren't picky — you were paying attention.

How Did We Test These Apps?

Here's what I actually did, and what I didn't. In April 2026 I ran first-hand testing on three apps: Character AI (logged twice — once in a team session, once solo on April 22), Candy AI, and ourdream.ai. Each session pushed past the honeymoon. I built a character, ran the chat through 30+ messages, tried to break the memory, and generated images or video where the feature existed.

The other five apps — Nomi, Replika, DreamGF, HeraHaven, and Anima — I evaluated through April 2026 review aggregations, current Trustpilot data, and platform-visible signals like free-tier mechanics, pricing pages, and signup friction. I'm not going to pretend I lived inside Nomi for a month. I didn't. The review consensus on those five is consistent enough across independent sources that I'd stake the rankings on it, but first-hand depth is only on the three I tested.

What I scored across all eight: free-tier honesty, NSFW capability, memory persistence, character creation depth, voice/image/video, and value. One credibility note. Common Sense Media's April 2025 risk assessment rated Character.AI, Replika, and Nomi “Unacceptable” for anyone under 18. None of the apps here are recommended for minors. That isn't editorial squeamishness; it's the documented finding.

How Do the 8 Best AI Girlfriend Apps Compare?

Here are the best AI girlfriend apps compared on the axes that actually matter — free tier honesty, NSFW capability, memory tier, voice / image / video, monthly price, and the lane each one fits. All data verified as of April 2026.

What Makes ourdream.ai the Best All-in-One AI Girlfriend App?

ourdream.ai is the best all-in-one AI girlfriend app because it's the only one on this list that ships chat, image generation, and video generation on a single tier — including the free trial. Most competitors pick a lane. ourdream picked all three and built a memory system that ties them together. It's the rare app that escapes both the text-only-flat failure mode and the image-forward-cheap one.

The 6-step character creation wizard is where the depth lives. You get appearance customization, 46 personality traits, 18 voice options, 135 occupations, and a backstory field that goes up to 100,000 characters. That last number sounds absurd until you realize it's how the long-term memory payoff compounds. She remembers you hate mornings because you wrote it in her backstory, and the memory layer keeps returning to the things you marked as worth remembering. Most AI character creators give you sliders. This one gives you a writing room.

The four-layer memory system — Auto Memory Log, Pinned Memories, Custom Instructions, and User Personas — is the wedge that closes the searcher's #1 unmet need. Reddit's most-upvoted threads on AI girlfriend apps are, almost without fail, complaints about memory loss. Per ourdream.ai's internal data, dreamers have created over 38 million characters and pinned more than 8 million memories across 1.83 million chats. That isn't a marketing line. It's what people actually do with the system.

On NSFW, the stance is unambiguous: no filter walls, no mid-scene censorship for adult roleplay. The honest caveat is that ourdream still blocks minors, deepfakes, and real-person lookalikes — enforced by an in-house moderation system processing 100M+ messages, images, and videos a day at a 0.13ms median block latency. “No NSFW restrictions” doesn't mean “no rules.” The rules are about real harm, not about the word “kiss.”

Pros:

• All-in-one. Chat + image + video on the same character, including on the 55-dreamcoin free trial.
• Memory depth. Four-layer memory plus a 100,000-character backstory field, a genuine depth gap on this list.
• No filter walls. Honest moderation against minors / deepfakes / real-person lookalikes only.
• A real platform. 63M+ registered dreamers, ranked #23 on a16z's Top 100 Gen AI Consumer Apps (6th edition), ahead of ElevenLabs and Cursor.

Cons:

• Video generation runs about 30–60 seconds per 5-second clip — slower than text-only competitors that don't render anything.
• The 6-step wizard has a learning curve if you've never built a character from scratch; Candy AI is faster to first message.

Key Features: ourdream's strength is that it doesn't make you choose. Chat, image, and video live on the same character, and so does her memory.

Pricing: Free trial of 55 dreamcoins (one-time, no card, no monthly renewal). Premium yearly at $9.99/mo billed annually ($119.88 upfront) with 1,000 dreamcoins/month plus 1,000 bonus first month. Premium monthly at $19.99/mo. See full ourdream pricing for the per-message and per-image breakdown.

Best For: Anyone who doesn't want to choose between chat depth and visual output. The only platform on this list that ships both well.

Why Does Nomi Have the Best Memory of Any AI Girlfriend App?

Nomi has the best memory of any AI girlfriend app. Multiple independent April 2026 review aggregations rate it best-in-class for long-term memory and emotional continuity, especially after extended paid use. If you treat memory as the wedge for what makes a companion feel real (and you should), Nomi wins this lane. Period. No qualification — for context on the underlying mechanics, see our nomi alternative breakdown.

The free tier gives you about 50 messages a day with one companion plus two selfies. That's enough to feel out the rhythm but not enough to test the long-arc memory claim, which is sort of the catch — Nomi's strength only really shows up after weeks of use, when it makes callbacks to things you barely remember telling it. Paid runs $15.99/month or $8.33/month on annual, which gets you unlimited messages, 40 images per day, voice chat, up to 10 companions, and full NSFW.

The Trustpilot picture is mixed and worth flagging honestly: 2.7/5 from 34 reviews as of March 2026. Small sample, mostly negative. The review consensus from review aggregators is materially more positive than Trustpilot, and the gap usually reflects who self-selects to leave Trustpilot reviews (people in the middle of a billing dispute). Don't oversell or undersell — note both signals and weigh them.

Pros:

• Best-in-class long-term memory and emotional continuity, especially after weeks of use.
• Voice chat on the paid tier.
• Full NSFW on paid, no toggle hunt.

Cons:

• Trustpilot 2.7/5 from a 34-review sample is noisy but worth flagging.
• Common Sense Media rated Nomi “Unacceptable” for anyone under 18 in April 2025.
• No native video generation — image and voice only.

Key Features: Nomi's strength is the long game. Give it weeks and it remembers things you barely remember telling it.

Pricing: Free tier with ~50 msg/day, 1 companion, 2 selfies/day. Paid monthly $15.99/mo. Paid yearly $99.99/yr (~$8.33/mo) for unlimited messages, 40 images/day, up to 10 companions, voice chat, full NSFW.

Best For: Long-term continuity. Memory callbacks across weeks of consistent use.

Why Pick Candy AI for Fast Onboarding?

Candy AI is the right pick for fast onboarding — for a deeper teardown, see our candy ai alternatives breakdown. You'll be selfies-deep with your companion before most other apps have even loaded the character creator. There's something about a slick first-five minutes flow that wins over a non-trivial slice of the buying-mode searcher market, and Candy has built its whole UX around that moment. From signup to first image is maybe ninety seconds. You don't have to read anything. The companion picker does the work.

The catch is what happens after those first ninety seconds. Candy AI sits squarely in what I think of as the second failure mode — image-forward, light on relationship simulation. The free tier is a 5-message tease, not a real free tier; you're paywalled before you know what you've signed up for. The paid plans run $5.99–$12.99/month and use a token-based model for image generation (4 tokens per image, 100 monthly tokens included), which is workable if you're focused but caps you faster than expected if you're heavy on output. Candy also doesn't let you build characters from scratch — you're picking from the company's pre-made roster, which speeds up onboarding but caps the ceiling on what you can build.

Trustpilot is actually decent here. 3.8/5 from 245 reviews as of March 2026, the largest review base in this shortlist. People who buy Candy and review it are, on balance, satisfied with what they bought. They were just buying a different thing than what ourdream or Nomi offers.

Pros:

• Fastest path from signup to first message in this entire roundup.
• Image generation reads as polished and selfie-realistic — clearly the priority.
• Trustpilot 3.8/5 from 245 reviews — largest review sample on this list.
• Broad pre-made character library if you don't want to build from scratch.

Cons:

• No custom character creation; you're picking from a menu, never building from the ground up.
• 5-message free cap means you're paywalled before you've evaluated the platform; trial honesty is poor.

Key Features: Candy AI's strength is speed. It's optimized for the first three minutes, not the next three months.

Pricing: Free tier ~5 messages, no images, no voice. Paid $5.99–$12.99/mo with token-based image generation (4 tokens/image, 100 monthly tokens).

Best For: Fastest signup-to-first-message flow. Pre-made-character browsers, not character builders.

Is Replika Still Worth It in 2026?

Replika is still worth it in 2026, but only if you signed up before February 2023 — or if your reader task is low-stakes daily check-ins rather than deep romantic roleplay. For a wider lens, see our best replika alternatives rundown. The two-tier reality matters here, and it's the lead-with-the-con context this section needs before the verdict makes any sense.

In February 2023, Replika's parent company Luka removed erotic roleplay (ERP) under regulatory pressure from the Italian Garante. ERP was partially restored in March 2023, but only for accounts registered before February 1, 2023 — a legacy grandfather clause. Anyone who signed up after that cannot access ERP at any tier, on free, on Pro, or at all. As of April 2026, that two-tier reality still holds. Luka's spinoff ERP-style app, Blush, was acquired by Linden Lab in August 2025, which is the current home for that demand.

So: if you registered before Feb 1, 2023, you have a different product than what new signups get. Keep that account. If you didn't, what you're getting is a calm, mood-tracking-leaning chat companion that's competent on emotional support and does not do roleplay above a PG threshold. Trustpilot sits at 3.6/5 from 365 reviews (March 2026). Average daily session time is around 14 minutes, well below Character.AI's 2-hour figure.

Pros:

• Free tier has unlimited SFW messaging (rare in this category).
• Calm, mood-tracking-forward experience that does emotional support competently.

Cons:

• Anyone who signed up post-Feb 2023 cannot access ERP at any tier — full stop.
• Pro at $19.99/mo is the priciest mainstream tier on this list.
• Voice, selfies, and romantic roleplay (for legacy accounts) all sit behind Pro.
• Common Sense Media rated Replika “Unacceptable” for anyone under 18 in April 2025.

Key Features: Replika's strength is the soft landing. It's the app that asks how your day was and actually waits for the answer.

Pricing: Free tier with unlimited SFW messaging and basic avatar customization. Pro monthly $19.99/mo. Pro yearly $69.99/yr (~$5.83/mo).

Best For: Low-stakes daily check-ins. Wellness-leaning chat, not roleplay.

Where Does Character.AI Fit on the Best AI Girlfriend App List?

Character.AI fits as the best free pre-made character library and the only credible answer for indefinite no-pay use — but the platform has visibly eroded through 2025 and 2026. For a deeper teardown of the erosion, see our character ai alternative rundown. Imagine telling someone in 2023 that the dominant AI character platform would, two years later, be the one with mid-chat ads, mandatory face-scan age verification, and a mass-deletion event called “Moderatedpocalypse.” That's where we are. Our standalone explainer on does character ai still have a filter walks through the post-Moderatedpocalypse moderation layer in detail. Character.AI didn't fall. It's just running uphill.

Character.AI wins for indefinite no-pay use. If you want a genuinely free AI chat app you'll never need to pay for, Character.AI is the answer. Full stop. The community-built bot library is the largest in the category, the messaging is unlimited, no card required.

The case against it is everything that's happened to that library since mid-2024. April 2026 brought mandatory face-scan age verification, and reports of people locked out who can't pass the scan aren't rare — for the broader question of is character ai safe across age groups, our standalone safety guide goes deeper on the rollout and the lawsuits behind it. In-conversation ads now interrupt free-tier chats mid-message. February 18, 2026 saw the “Moderatedpocalypse” event, a mass bot removal that deleted huge swaths of community-created characters with years of accumulated creator effort behind them. The platform also remains heavily filtered.

Memory is the other problem. From my April 22 testing log, Character.AI's memory degraded after about 20 messages — the AI forgot the character's name and lost the plot, even with a defined persona and a system prompt. The documented context window is around 3,000 tokens total (roughly 2,000 usable after system prompts), which translates to 15–20 minutes before forgetting.

Pros:

• Genuinely free, unlimited messaging, no card — the only app on this list with that property.
• Largest pre-made character library in the category, by a wide margin.
• Wins indefinite no-pay use, period.

Cons:

• Memory degrades after ~20 messages per first-hand testing (April 22, 2026).
• April 2026 mandatory face-scan age verification adds real friction at the door.
• In-conversation ads interrupt free-tier chats; the platform has deteriorated through 2025–2026.

Key Features: Character.AI's strength is the library — and its weakness is everything that's happened to that library since mid-2024.

Pricing: Free tier with unlimited messaging (with ads), 5 free image attachments. c.ai+ monthly $9.99/mo. c.ai+ yearly ~$94.99/yr (~$7.92/mo).

Best For: Indefinite no-pay use. Pick a pre-made character and treat it as improv, not a long arc.

Why Pick DreamGF for Visual-First Companion Building?

DreamGF is the right pick if you want visual-first companion building — for a related deep dive on image-first tools, see our coverage of ai porn generation. It's optimized for image and short-video output more than long-arc relationship simulation. Sometimes you just want the visual layer to be the point, and DreamGF doesn't pretend the chat is the main event. It builds the UX around the assumption that you're here to render — which, refreshingly, is at least an honest read of what most of its audience came for.

The free tier is thin: roughly 10–15 SFW messages per day plus a handful of trial tokens. NSFW (chat, images, voice) is fully gated behind payment. No free taste at all. Paid plans range from $9.99 to $31.99 per month and use a token economy for generation (50–150 tokens per image, depending on quality and length), which is workable if you're focused but caps you faster than expected if you're heavy on output.

Pros:

• Strong image and short-video output on the paid tier.
• Visual-first builder UX feels intentional, not bolted onto a chat app.
• Image library variety is broad.

Cons:

• NSFW fully paywalled — no free taste means harder to evaluate before buying.
• Token economy on paid tier means heavy creators still hit caps faster than expected.

Key Features: DreamGF's strength is visual variety. If you treat the chat as a prompt input for the image generator, it works.

Pricing: Free tier ~10–15 SFW msg/day plus trial tokens. Paid $9.99–$31.99/mo with token-based image and video generation (50–150 tokens per image).

Best For: Visual-first companion building. Image and short-video output above chat depth.

What Does HeraHaven Do Best?

HeraHaven does fantasy and anime aesthetic best — if anime is the lane, our anime ai girlfriend page covers more options that lean into the same aesthetic. It's the niche pick for people who want a stylized, illustrated companion rather than a photorealistic selfie generator. The renders feel native to the genre, not template-skinned, which is more than I can say for some competitors who treat anime as a filter you toggle on photorealism.

The free tier is genuinely thin — about 10 messages per character, no image generation, medium memory, no voice. Premium runs roughly $9.95–$19.95 per month and gives you unlimited messaging, image generation, and out-of-box NSFW. No toggle hunt, no hidden setting buried three menus deep. HeraHaven's character library is smaller than Character.AI's or Candy AI's, which is the trade-off for the genre focus.

Pros:

• Anime / fantasy aesthetic feels native, not a template skin.
• NSFW out-of-box on premium; no toggle hunt.

Cons:

• Free tier is genuinely thin (~10 messages per character).
• Medium memory only; no long-arc continuity.
• Smaller character library than Character.AI or Candy AI.

Key Features: HeraHaven's strength is aesthetic. If you've never met an elf you didn't want to flirt with, this is your lane.

Pricing: Free tier ~10 msg per character, no images. Premium $9.95–$19.95/mo for unlimited messaging, image generation, out-of-box NSFW.

Best For: Stylized fantasy and anime aesthetic over photorealism.

What Does Anima Do Best?

Anima does budget anime-style NSFW best. It's the entry-level mobile-first option for people who want anime aesthetic without the higher price points of HeraHaven or Candy AI. Honest framing first: Anima isn't winning on depth. The free tier gives you about 40 messages a day with no NSFW. The paid tier runs $7.99–$12 per month, with the annual rate dropping to roughly $3.33 per month — and that is the actual reason to consider it.

Paid gets you unlimited messaging, NSFW roleplay, and anime-style image generation. Memory is basic, voice is absent, the chat reads scripted on the free tier, and the experience never quite escapes the second failure mode even after you pay. But if you want anime-style NSFW chat for under five dollars a month and you're not picky about long-term memory or voice, Anima is the budget lane. The annual rate undercuts every other paid option in this list.

Key Features: Anima's strength is the price floor. Cheapest annual rate in this category, period.

Pricing: Free tier ~40 msg/day, no NSFW. Paid monthly $7.99–$12/mo. Paid annual ~$3.33/mo equivalent for unlimited messaging, NSFW roleplay, anime-style image generation.

Best For: Cheapest annual paid lane in the category. Anime-style NSFW on a budget.

What If You Want an Open-Source AI Girlfriend?

If you want an open-source AI girlfriend, the canonical April 2026 stack is SillyTavern paired with a local LLM backend like KoboldCPP, Ollama, or llama.cpp. Hardware-wise: 6–10GB VRAM minimum for entry-level 7B–13B models, 12–24GB for mid-range 34B, 24GB+ for 70B+ models. This is for technical creators who want full control. The setup curve is real — you trade convenience for sovereignty. If you don't already know what a quantized GGUF is, you probably want one of the apps above instead.

Why Skip These AI Girlfriend Apps?

Skip these AI girlfriend apps because they fail the basic test of being a real platform rather than a chat skin. The category has 337 active revenue-generating apps as of mid-2025, and the top 10% capture 89% of revenue. The other 90% is mostly noise. Two patterns to avoid:

• Generic Google Play wrapper apps. Stock-photo avatars, no original character system, review counts under a thousand, and a name that sounds suspiciously like a domain that was available three weeks ago. They're chat skins on top of a generic LLM API — no proprietary memory tier, no platform infrastructure, often a reskin of an open-source frontend with ads bolted on. Mozilla's Privacy Not Included review found that all 11 romantic AI chatbots they audited failed Minimum Privacy Standards. One of them, Romantic AI, triggered 24,354 ad trackers within a single minute of use.
• Parasite-domain editorial placements. “AI girlfriend app of the year” features that pay-to-play onto big news sites. The placement isn't editorial, it's sponsored content disguised as independent review. Spot-check: no named tester, no methodology disclosure, the same five “winners” appearing across uncannily similar pages.

FAQ

So Where Does This Leave You?

Where this leaves you depends on what you actually want from an AI girlfriend app — not what the category sells you on. Most apps still pick a side of the text-vs-image divide rather than ship both well on the same character, and the gap between the top tier and everything else is wider than it's ever been. If you want indefinite-free chat and don't need NSFW or images, Character.AI is the answer, caveats and all. If memory is the thing you keep losing companions over, Nomi. If your reader task is fast onboarding and polished selfies in two minutes, Candy AI. And if you don't want to pick which failure mode to live with, ourdream.ai is the one I'd start with — partly because it's where I work, mostly because it's the only one on this list that ships chat, image, and video on the same character with memory that actually persists.